Comparing Multiple Solution Alternatives

Slide Content

The slide is designed to compare multiple solution alternatives using a Compliance Matrix Table that details the fulfillment status according to specified criteria. The table contains five columns for different criteria, with "ROI" and "Time to implement" specifically mentioned. Each row represents a solution (#1 to #4), with checkmarks and crosses indicating whether the solution meets the respective criteria. For example, "ROI" denotes the return on investment efficiency, while "Time to implement" refers to how quickly a solution can be operational.

Graphical Look

• The slide uses a color scheme primarily consisting of blue, orange, and white.
• There are four rows of orange rectangles labeled "Solution #1" through "Solution #4" representing different solutions or options.
• Each solution has five corresponding cells that either contain a blue checkmark or a red cross, signifying the evaluation of each criterion.
• Five blue rectangles represent the criteria headers, with two showing example text ("ROI" and "Time to implement") and the remaining three with placeholder text (“Place a short description here”).
• The header of the slide features a large bold font stating the title "Comparing Multiple Solution Alternatives", with a subtitle in smaller font below.
• The icons used are simplistic and easily interpretable; the checkmark indicates positive compliance while the cross denotes non-compliance.

The overall look of the slide is clean and professional with a structured layout that's easy to follow. The contrasting colors assist in distinguishing between different sections and the evaluation outcomes of each solution.

Use Cases

• To present a comparison of different business solutions or products based on multiple evaluation criteria during a meeting.
• To provide a visual aid for decision-making processes in strategy sessions by comparing prospective plan or project fulfillments.
• To summarize market research findings by evaluating and comparing various offerings against key performance indicators.
• To facilitate discussions on resource allocation by comparing project proposals against business objectives and constraints.